So for Today's Death Battle: Sub Zero V Glacius.
Sub Zero wins...and because one of the determining factors was that he was "Stronger" than Glacius...and this was determined by the people of DB because of The 'Test your Might' mini game in MK....They did this for Sonya v Cammy as well...but NOT for Akuma V Shang.....Are these guys not only inconsistent, but SERIOUSLY Retarded!?!?!?? LMAO!!

"Sub Zero can break titanium" ....Yea, so can Sonya, Mokap, Stryker, Cassie, I can literally go down the ENTIRE MK roster.... I guess the only guys who can't break Titanium are the Boss characters because those are the only guys the Players like myself can't use on 'Test Your Might' and other non canon mini games......Are you serious???! Lol

And THIS is why people, MOST TIMES You CANNOT use Death Battle results and research as FACTS for ANY REAL 'Fictional Char Vs' Debates... This is why the "whiny DBZfaboys" as some people call them constantly rant on the Goku V Supes matches being poorly researched...because these guys use BS reasoning and research to come to conclusions and the matchup today is another addition to the ongoing evidence.  Now I like Death Battle, but I NEVER take them Legit unless they ARE legit. Its solely for Entertainment...again, unless they DO have legit facts and reasoning.

But today's DB research and reasoning was retarded as hell, and makes me question if Sub Zero really would win against Glacius... cuz i don't know much about Killer Instinct. smh

If you like to debate fiction chars, Do your own research and use CREDIBLE sources/people when doing it.

End of rant.